Abstract

BackgroundPandy's test is used to assess the globulin level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). As a semi-quantitative manual method, the practicality and clinical value of Pandy's test has been challenged. ObjectiveWe tend to summarize the relationship between CSF total protein (CSF-TP) quantification and Pandy's results, providing a formula to estimate Pandy's results merely by CSF-TP value. MethodsThis retrospective study involved 1090 cases hospitalized in Huashan Hospital during 1/1/2023 to 20/4/2023. All samples were divided into six group based on their Pandy's results. Their corresponding CSF-TP quantitative results were subsequently analyzed and summarized. Another 364 patients were also gathered for verification. ResultsThe turbidity of samples won't affect examiners'ocular inspection and interpretation of Pandy's tests in positive groups. The results of Pandy's tests can be deduced based on CSF-TP quantitative results according to following rules: CSF-TP quantitative results 0–614 mg/L for Pandy negative (−), 615–1322 mg/L for extremely weak positive (±), 1323–2953 mg/L for weak positive (1+), 2954–6561 mg/L for medium positive results (2+), 6562–13007 mg/L for strong positive results (3+) and CSF-TP results >13007 for strongest positive (4+). The quantitative range above was experimentally verified as effective and correct by calculating the agreement rate through another 364 samples and the R ratio of each Pandy group was greater than 90 %. ConclusionThere is an excellent correlation between CSF-TP and Pandy's test. Therefore, CSF-TP quantification test through PROT Slides can be used to infer the results of Pandy's test to accelerate the abolish of this traditional manual test.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.