An alternative continuous caudal block with caudad catheterization via lower lumbar interspace in adult patients.

Abstract

Continuous caudal block with caudad catheterization has not yet been mentioned in literatures. We designed a preliminary study to investigate the feasibleness of this technique, spread of contrast medium under fluoroscopy, and its clinical effectiveness. Ten patients were subjected to epidural block (caudal) for elective anal or vaginal procedures. The entry of the epidural needle was made at the L4-5 interspace either with midline or paramedian approach. Through an 18 G Touhy needle with its bevel facing caudally an epidural catheter was threaded until a length of 10 cm was beyond the point of entry. The presence or absence of paresthesia during the passage of catheter and the ease with which the catheter was inserted were recorded. After the procedure, the course on which the catheter traversed and the spread of the medicinal substance in the epidural space were visualized and studied fluoroscopically using 1 and 3 ml iohexol (omnipaque 300 mg/ml) as contrast medium respectively. Then the patients were brought to operating rooms for anesthesia and surgery. Sensory anesthetic level and motor blockade were evaluated fifteen min after 11-15 ml of 2% lidocaine had been injected through the epidural catheter. During anesthesia vital signs were closely monitored, and adverse reaction if any was evaluated and managed. The insertion of the epidural catheter was considered easy and caused no paresthesia in nine patients. Catheter insertion encountered moderate resistance and induced paresthesia in one patient. Yet, the catheter was advanced successfully to the expected length. In radiological study with contrast medium, the course of the epidural catheter was not always traceable, while the spread of the contrast medium was clearly identified. Epidural spread occurred in eight patients, left paravertebral spread in one patient, and right retrorectal spread in another one patient. As to clinical assessment, adequate sensory blockade with local anesthetic was gained in 8 patients with well-preserved motor function of the lower limbs. In one patient the caudal block worked well after the withdrawal of the catheter 5 cm in length. Spinal anesthesia was supplemented in one patient due to failure of the caudal block. Continuous caudal block with caudawise catheterization via lower lumbar interspaces is feasible (eight of 10 patients in this study) with respect to technique and clinical effect. Paravertebral and retrorectal migrations of the catheter may occur in spite of smooth catheterization. Either migration might lead to a failure of caudal block.