Abstract

Background Diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) remains challenging despite guidelines from national organizations. Motor testing of hand intrinsic muscles remains a common diagnostic method fraught with challenges. Objective The aim of the study is to demonstrate utility of an uncommon nerve conduction study (NCS), mixed across the elbow, when diagnosing UNE. Methods Retrospective analysis of 135 patients, referred to an outpatient University-based electrodiagnostic laboratory with suspected UNE between January 2013 and June 2019 who had motor to abductor digiti minimi (ADM), motor to first dorsal interosseus (FDI), and mixed across the elbow NCS completed. To perform the mixed across the elbow NCS, the active bar electrode was placed 10-cm proximal to the medial epicondyle between the biceps and triceps muscle bellies. The median nerve was stimulated at the wrist followed by stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the ulnar styloid. The difference between peak latencies, labeled the ulnar-median mixed latency difference (U-MLD), was used to evaluate for correlation between the nerve conduction velocities (NCV) of ADM and FDI. Results Pearson r -values = −0.479 and −0.543 ( p < 0.00001) when comparing U-MLD to ADM and FDI NCV across the elbow, respectively. The negative r -value describes the inverse relationship between ulnar velocity across the elbow and increasing U-MLD. Conclusion Mixed across the elbow has moderate–strong correlation with ADM and FDI NCV across the elbow. All three tests measure ulnar nerve function slightly differently. Without further prospective data, the most accurate test remains unclear. The authors propose some combination of the three tests may be most beneficial when diagnosing UNE.

Highlights

  • Diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) remains challenging despite guidelines from national organizations

  • One patient had absent responses at both ulnar and median mixed nerve conduction study (NCS) across the elbow; this patient was diagnosed with a length-dependent axonal sensorimotor peripheral polyneuropathy

  • One comparing ulnar-median mixed latency difference (U-MLD) to across elbow nerve conduction velocities (NCV) for both abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) excluding those patients with absent responses for the mixed NCS and the Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury Vol 15 No 1/2020

Read more

Summary

Methods

Data Collection Prior to data collection, this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at both Michigan State University and McLaren Healthcare with a waiver for informed consent and in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). 135 patients met the original inclusion criteria, two of those patients had absent motor responses above the elbow This left 133 patient charts that would satisfy all data points for statistical analysis and began electrodiagnostic testing with suspected UNE. The bar electrode was applied with the active electrode placed 10-cm proximal to the medial epicondyle between the bellies of biceps and triceps muscles and the ground placed in the mid forearm[2] (►Fig. 1) Both median and ulnar nerves were respectively stimulated at the wrist with the elbow extended. The difference between the peak distal latencies for the ulnar and median nerves created the ulnar-median mixed latency difference (U-MLD)

Results
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.