An adaptive synchronous extraction (ASE) method for estimating intensity and footprint of surface urban heat islands: A case study of 254 North American cities

Abstract

The urban heat island (UHI) effect has attracted great attention due to its potential impacts on rapidly growing urban areas. Using remotely sensed estimates of land surface temperature (LST), a large number of studies have focused on the surface UHI (SUHI) effect, which can be characterized by its two fundamental properties: intensity and footprint. The SUHI intensity reflects the LST difference between the urban area and the background reference area (BRA), and the SUHI footprint indicates the spatial extent influenced by the heat island. Currently, numerous methods have been developed to estimate the SUHI intensity and footprint, but are still greatly challenged by three main issues. Namely, the discrepancy in BRA selection criterion brings great uncertainty to the estimated SUHI intensity, the estimation of SUHI footprint is largely constrained by the predefined models, and the quantification of SUHI effect is potentially influenced by several confounding factors. Here, we proposed an adaptive synchronous extraction (ASE) method, which is capable of adaptively selecting the most optimal BRA while removing the influence of confounding factors, and achieving synchronous estimation of SUHI intensity and footprint. We applied the ASE method to 254 North American cities and conducted an in-depth comparative analysis to discuss its applicability and benefits. The main results include: (1) The ASE method avoids the limitations of existing methods in BRA selection and model presetting, and shows resilience to parameter variations. This makes the ASE method highly applicable to quantify the SUHI intensity and footprint in cities with various thermal characteristics. (2) The ASE method can better highlight the spatial, seasonal and day-night contrasts in the estimated SUHI intensity. This superiority is particularly evident when comparing it to methods based on the equal-area buffer or the simplified urban-extent algorithm. (3) Confounding factors pose non-negligible impacts on the quantification of the SUHI effect. Typically, ignoring the influence of topographic relief or missing LST data can lead to an overall overestimation of the SUHI intensity, while not removing surrounding urban areas will cause some underestimation of the SUHI intensity. Overall, the proposed ASE method provides a new generalizable tool for quantifying the SUHI effect, which has great potentials for future studies and urban climate assessments.