Abstract

Feature selection is known to be an applicable solution to address the problem of high dimensionality in software defect prediction (SDP). However, choosing an appropriate filter feature selection (FFS) method that will generate and guarantee optimal features in SDP is an open research issue, known as the filter rank selection problem. As a solution, the combination of multiple filter methods can alleviate the filter rank selection problem. In this study, a novel adaptive rank aggregation-based ensemble multi-filter feature selection (AREMFFS) method is proposed to resolve high dimensionality and filter rank selection problems in SDP. Specifically, the proposed AREMFFS method is based on assessing and combining the strengths of individual FFS methods by aggregating multiple rank lists in the generation and subsequent selection of top-ranked features to be used in the SDP process. The efficacy of the proposed AREMFFS method is evaluated with decision tree (DT) and naïve Bayes (NB) models on defect datasets from different repositories with diverse defect granularities. Findings from the experimental results indicated the superiority of AREMFFS over other baseline FFS methods that were evaluated, existing rank aggregation based multi-filter FS methods, and variants of AREMFFS as developed in this study. That is, the proposed AREMFFS method not only had a superior effect on prediction performances of SDP models but also outperformed baseline FS methods and existing rank aggregation based multi-filter FS methods. Therefore, this study recommends the combination of multiple FFS methods to utilize the strength of respective FFS methods and take advantage of filter–filter relationships in selecting optimal features for SDP processes.

Highlights

  • Scenario A is based on assessing and comparing the prediction performances of naïve Bayes (NB) and decision tree (DT) models based on proposed aggregation-based ensemble multi-filter feature selection (AREMFFS) and baseline feature selection (FS) (CS, information gain (IG), REF, and NoFS) methods

  • Scenario B is defined by evaluating and comparing the prediction performances of NB and DT models based on the proposed AREMFFS method and the existing (Min, Max, Mean, Range, GMean, HMean) rank aggregation-based multi-filter FS methods

  • This study focuses on resolving high dimensionality and filter rank selection problems in software defect prediction by proposing a novel AREMFFS method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Selecting a fitting FFS method for SDP is a problem This is based on findings from existing studies on the impact of FSS in SDP, which concluded that there is no one best FSS method and that their respective performances depend on selected datasets and classifiers [15,19,21,22]. This observation can be due to incomplete and disjointed feature ranking of FFS methods in SDP.

Related Works
Classification Algorithms
Feature Selection Method
Multi-Filter FS Phase
Ensemble Rank Aggregation Phase
Backtracking Function Phase
Software Defect Datasets
Experimental Procedure
Performance Evaluation Metrics
Results and Discussion
Experimental Results on Scenario A
Box-plot
Scott–KnottESD
Experimental Results on Scenario B
10. Box-plot
13. Scott–KnottESD
16. Box-plot
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call