Abstract

Tailoring warfarin use poses a challenge for physicians and pharmacists due to its narrow therapeutic window and substantial inter-individual variability. This study aimed to create an adapted neural-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model using preprocessed balance data to improve the predictive accuracy of warfarin maintenance dosing in Chinese patients undergoing heart valve replacement (HVR). This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent HVR between June 1, 2012, and June 1, 2016, from 35 centers in China. The primary outcomes were the mean difference between predicted warfarin dose by ANFIS models and actual dose and the models' predictive accuracy, including the ideal predicted percentage, the mean absolute error (MAE), and the mean squared error (MSE). The eligible cases were divided into training, internal validation, and external validation groups. We explored input variables by univariate analysis of a general linear model and created two ANFIS models using imbalanced and balanced training sets. We finally compared the primary outcomes between the imbalanced and balanced ANFIS models in both internal and external validation sets. Stratified analyses were conducted across warfarin doses (low, medium, and high doses). A total of 15,108 patients were included and grouped as follows: 12,086 in the imbalanced training set; 2820 in the balanced training set; 1511 in the internal validation set; and 1511 in the external validation set. Eight variables were explored as predictors related to warfarin maintenance doses, and imbalanced and balanced ANFIS models with multi-fuzzy rules were developed. The results showed a low mean difference between predicted and actual doses (< 0.3 mg/d for each model) and an accurate prediction property in both the imbalanced model (ideal prediction percentage, 74.39-78.16%; MAE, 0.37 mg/daily; MSE, 0.39 mg/daily) and the balanced model (ideal prediction percentage, 73.46-75.31%; MAE, 0.42 mg/daily; MSE, 0.43 mg/daily). Compared to the imbalanced model, the balanced model had a significantly higher prediction accuracy in the low-dose (14.46% vs. 3.01%; P < 0.001) and the high-dose warfarin groups (34.71% vs. 23.14%; P = 0.047). The results from the external validation cohort confirmed this finding. The ANFIS model can accurately predict the warfarin maintenance dose in patients after HVR. Through data preprocessing, the balanced model contributed to improved prediction ability in the low- and high-dose warfarin groups.

Highlights

  • Warfarin, with a clear effectiveness and price advantage, is recommended for the prevention of thrombosis after heat valve replacement (HVR) [1]

  • The primary outcomes were the mean difference between predicted warfarin dose by adapted neural-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models and actual dose, and the models’ predictive accuracy, including the ideal predicted percentage, the mean absolute error (MAE), and the mean squared error (MSE)

  • Eight variables were explored as predictors related to warfarin maintenance doses, and imbalanced and balanced ANFIS models with multi-fuzzy rules were developed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With a clear effectiveness and price advantage, is recommended for the prevention of thrombosis after heat valve replacement (HVR) [1]. There is currently no warfarin maintenance dose prediction model that is able to achieve an overall prediction accuracy higher than 70% [6,7,8]. We established the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) [9], the Back-Propagation neural network with Genetic Algorithm (BP-GA) [10], the Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) [11], and the Adapted Neural-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) models [12], based on machine learning algorithms, to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin. To improve the model prediction effect in low- and high-dose patient groups, we attempted to correct the CIL problem by. This study aimed to create an adapted neural-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model using preprocessed balance data to improve the predictive accuracy of warfarin maintenance dosing in Chinese patients undergoing heart valve replacement (HVR)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.