Abstract

Following focal sensory adaptation, the perceived separation between visual stimuli that straddle the adapted region is often exaggerated. For instance, in the tilt aftereffect illusion, adaptation to tilted lines causes subsequently viewed lines with nearby orientations to be perceptually repelled from the adapted orientation. Repulsion illusions in the nonvisual senses have been less studied. Here, we investigated whether adaptation induces a repulsion illusion in tactile spatial perception. In a two-interval forced-choice task, participants compared the perceived separation between two point-stimuli applied on the forearms successively. Separation distance was constant on one arm (the reference) and varied on the other arm (the comparison). In Experiment 1, we took three consecutive baseline measurements, verifying that in the absence of manipulation, participants’ distance perception was unbiased across arms and stable across experimental blocks. In Experiment 2, we vibrated a region of skin on the reference arm, verifying that this focally reduced tactile sensitivity, as indicated by elevated monofilament detection thresholds. In Experiment 3, we applied vibration between the two reference points in our distance perception protocol and discovered that this caused an illusory increase in the separation between the points. We conclude that focal adaptation induces a repulsion aftereffect illusion in tactile spatial perception. The illusion provides clues as to how the tactile system represents spatial information. The analogous repulsion aftereffects caused by adaptation in different stimulus domains and sensory systems may point to fundamentally similar strategies for dynamic sensory coding.

Highlights

  • Prolonged exposure to stimulation causes a reduction in neuronal firing rate

  • The Point of Subjective Equality (PSE) was extracted as a measure of participants’ perceived distance between the reference points

  • In Experiment 2A, we found that vibration caused an elevation of monofilament detection thresholds that increased with the duration of vibration. 71% correct detection thresholds at the center of the vibration site were 0.16 ± 0.05 g, 0.20 ± 0.07 g, 0.52 ± 0.12 g and 0.80 ± 0.17 g for the NA, 40 s adaptation, 40 s adaptation with 3 s top-ups, and 40 s adaptation with 7 s top-ups conditions (Figure 4A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prolonged exposure to stimulation causes a reduction in neuronal firing rate. For reasons that have yet to be elucidated, this phenomenon, adaptation, is ubiquitous in neural sensory systems (Wark et al, 2007; Sato and Aihara, 2011). Adaptation may have several beneficial consequences: it may support perceptual constancy, increase the salience of novel stimuli, improve discrimination and improve coding efficiency (for review see Webster, 2012). A seemingly non-beneficial consequence of focal adaptation is that it produces illusions. Following focal adaptation, the perceived separation between stimuli that straddle the adapted region is often exaggerated. A well-known example of this is the visual tilt after effect

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call