Abstract

A significant integration of energy storage systems is taking place to offer flexibility to electrical networks and to mitigate side effects of a high penetration of distributed energy resources. To accommodate this, new processes are needed for the design, implementation, and proof-of-concept of emerging storage systems services, such as voltage and frequency regulation, and reduction of energy costs, among others. Nowadays, modern approaches are getting popular to support engineers during the design and development process of such multi-functional energy storage systems. Nevertheless, these approaches still lack flexibility needed to accommodate changing practices and requirements from control engineers and along the development process. With that in mind, this paper shows how a modern development approach for rapid prototyping of multi-functional battery energy storage system applications can be extended to provide this needed flexibility. For this, an expert user is introduced, which has the sole purpose of adapting the existing engineering approach to fulfill any new requirements from the control engineers. To achieve this, the expert user combines concepts from model-driven engineering and ontologies to reach an adaptable engineering support framework. As a result, new engineering requirements, such as new information sources and target platforms, can be automatically included into the engineering approach by the expert user, providing the control engineer with further support during the development process. The usefulness of the proposed solution is shown with a selected use case related to the implementation of an application for a battery energy storage system. It demonstrates how the expert user can fully adapt an existing engineering approach to the control engineer’s needs and thus increase the effectiveness of the whole engineering process.

Highlights

  • The reduction of CO2 emissions is motivating the integration of renewables into power grids

  • The identified open issues are handled by the Energy Management System Ontology (EMSOnto) expert, whose main role is the customization of the EMSOnto according to control engineer’s requirements

  • Those are summarized as the extension of the Energy Management Systems (EMS)-TBox, setting up of new rules and queries, extension of EMS-templates, and the conception of data models and transformation rules

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The reduction of CO2 emissions is motivating the integration of renewables into power grids. Thereby, the EMS development process should consider interoperability across systems as well as evolving requirements of smart grid systems In this context, the realization of EMS involves challenging tasks, such as alignment with smart grid information models, conflicts resolution within a multi-functional system, as well as handling a diversity of tools for EMS validation. The realization of EMS involves challenging tasks, such as alignment with smart grid information models, conflicts resolution within a multi-functional system, as well as handling a diversity of tools for EMS validation Different approaches handle these issues to different degrees as demonstrated by Zanabria et al [4]. The referred study shows attempts to benefit from available information sources (SGAM models) in an automated way Another approach, the so called Energy Management System Ontology (EMSOnto) [8] proposes a resolution of conflicts within an EMS [9].

ESS Application Development Process Using Modern Engineering Approaches
Realization of Multi-Functional ESS Applications
Application Engineering Using Modern Approaches
EMSOnto Development Process
Open Issues
Mechanisms to Automate and Increase Flexibility of EMSOnto
EMSOnto Expert Participation
Transformation Mechanisms and Techniques
Model-Driven Engineering in Power System Domain
UML Representation of EMS-Ontology
Use Case to Be Analyzed by the EMSOnto Expert
Requirements from Control Engineers
Analysis Phase
Realization Phase
SWRL rules
Action 1
Action 2
Action 3
Action 4
Action 5
Action 6
Action 7
EMS-Templates
UC and IED Repository
Constraints of the CEMS
Inconsistencies Report
Conclusion
SoC Estimator Function
Software Artifacts Generation
Evaluation of Requirements and Open Issues
Conclusions
44. Massif

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.