Abstract
Frequency response functions (FRFs) can be estimated only from responses of structures without knowledge of input forces. Mode shapes identified from operational modal analysis (OMA) methods are unscaled, and the unscaled mode shapes provide unscaled FRFs. In this paper, mass change and mass–stiffness methods are employed to construct FRFs from the response-only measurements. A numerical case study of a cantilever beam is investigated using the finite element method. It is shown that the mass–stiffness change method provides more accurate results compared to the mass change method in the low-frequency range. A laboratory-scale steel beam is also tested using an OMA method and conventional hammer test. The experimental results show better accuracy of the identified FRFs in the low-frequency range when the mass–stiffness method is used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.