Abstract

Ab initio Hartree–Fock calculations using the 6-31G(d), 6-31G(2d), 6-31G(d,p), 6-311G(d,p), 6-31+G(d), and 6-311+G(d,p) basis sets, second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) using the same basis sets, and density functional theory [SVWN/DN ∗, SVWN/DN ∗∗, pBP/DN ∗, pBP/DN ∗∗, BLYP/6–31G(d), B3BLYP/6–31G(d)] were used to calculate the geometry optimized structure of tetrahydro-2 H-thiopyran (tetrahydrothiopyran, thiacyclohexane, thiane) and the conformational enthalpy (Δ H°), entropy (Δ S°), and free energy (Δ G°) of the chair conformers of methylcyclohexane and 2-methyl-, 3-methyl-, and 4-methyltetrahydro-2 H-thiopyran. The DFT methods generally overestimate the conformational free energies (−Δ G°) while some of the MP2 methods give values closer to the experimental results. The MP2/6-311G(d,p) calculated value (− ΔG°=1.46 kcal/mol) for 2-methyltetrahydro-2 H-thiopyran is in excellent agreement with the experimentally reported value and the MP2/6-21G(2d) calculated value (− ΔG°=1.46 kcal/mol) for 3-methyltetrahydro-2 H-thiopyran is also in excellent agreement with the experimentally reported value. The equatorial preference of the methyl group is discussed in terms of the repulsive nonbonded interactions in the equatorial conformer, gauche butane (torsional) interactions in the axial conformer, and repulsive nonbonded interactions of the axial methyl group with the ring carbons and hydrogens.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.