Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Allocation of scarce healthcare resources is a hot issue. We all believe resources should be distributed justly, the trouble is no one seems quite sure what is just. Should resources be distributed according to need, according to a legal or regulatory entitlement or according to what a person has earned? And who should decide? John Rawls offered us a thought experiment. Imagine that you and a few others were put in a room together but somehow none of you can remember your previous role in society: you can’t remember if you are a barrister or a barista, a cardiologist or a cleaner, a trust fund manager or a tramp. When the experiment is over you will return to society. Together you are charged with creating the rules that determine resource allocation within society: who will earn what, and who will get what when trouble strikes. Rawls claims that we …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
