Abstract

The value of imaging regional glucose metabolism with [18F]FDG PET for the prediction of progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is controversial. The predictive value of imaging with [18F]FDG PET was therefore tested and compared with that of imaging beta-amyloid load with [11C]PIB PET in the same memory clinic population of MCI patients. Thirty-nine patients with MCI who had undergone [18F]FDG as well as [11C]PIB PET were identified from a single-centre clinical registry. [18F]FDG and [11C]PIB PET images were rated as positive or negative for the presence of regional hypometabolism typical of AD and beta-amyloid deposition, respectively. Raters were blinded to the clinical information. Patients were followed clinically for 2.7 ± 1.2years after PET. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and sex, were used to test the predictive value of [18F]FDG PET, [11C]PIB PET, and both in combination. [18F]FDG PET did not significantly predict conversion to AD (p > 0.1). By contrast, models including [11C]PIB PET only (p < 0.05) or both [18F]FDG and [11C]PIB PET (p < 0.05) significantly predicted conversion to AD. The hazard ratio for AD in patients with a positive [11C]PIB scan was 10.2 (95% confidence interval 1.3-78.1). The results were confirmed by analysis of semiquantitative measures using normalized [18F]FDG uptake and [11C]PIB standardized uptake value ratios in AD-typical regions as continuous predictors. In contrast to [11C]PIB PET, [18F]FDG PET did not predict conversion from MCI to AD in this clinical patient sample. Therefore, amyloid PET should be preferred for individual prediction and patient counselling in clinical practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.