Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine functional connectivity among patients with pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) who are responders to pharmacotherapy and those who are nonresponders, and learn how they differ from healthy controls (HC) while performing a task that engages affective and cognitive neural systems. PBD participants (n = 34; 13.4 ± 2.3 years) were defined as responders if there was ≥ 50% improvement in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores (n = 22) versus nonresponders with < 50% improvement (n = 12) with one of three mood stabilizing medications (divalproex, risperidone, or lamotrigine). HC (n = 14; 14.2 ± 3.1 years) participants also were scanned at baseline and follow-up. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants performed a color-matching task in which they had to match the color of positive, negative, or neutral words with colored dots. Independent component analysis was used to identify functionally connected networks across the whole brain, which were subsequently interrogated using region-of-interest analyses to test for group differences. A frontolimbic network was identified that showed impaired functional integration in PBD relative to HC when participants viewed negatively valenced words. PBD medication responders showed greater connectivity of the amygdala into the network before and after treatment compared with nonresponders, with responders showing a pattern more similar to HC than to nonresponders. Regardless of medication type, the degree of amygdala functional connectivity predicted medication response as well as the improvement in YMRS scores across responders and nonresponders. These findings suggest that increased functional integration of the amygdala within the frontolimbic network might be a biomarker of general mood stabilizer medication responsivity in bipolar disorder.

Highlights

  • Pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) is a highly debilitating disorder marked by affective instability and cognitive problems (Birmaher et al, 2009; Geller and Luby, 1997; Pavuluri et al, 2005a)

  • The PBD group responded significantly slower than healthy controls (HC) on the pediatric affective color-matching task, F(1, 46) = 5.34, p = 0.025, but this difference was marginal after treatment, F(1, 46) = 4.02, p = 0.051)

  • The PBD group responded slower than HC for the positive and neutral words in the first session [positive: t(46) = 2.5, p = 0.016; neutral: t(46) = 2.6, p = 0.013], but for the negative and neutral words in the second session [negative: t(46) = 2.3, p = 0.028; neutral: t(46) = 2.2, p = 0.035], as revealed by a significant three-way interaction, F(2, 92) = 3.41, p = 0.037

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) is a highly debilitating disorder marked by affective instability and cognitive problems (Birmaher et al, 2009; Geller and Luby, 1997; Pavuluri et al, 2005a). PBD can be challenging to treat effectively. Mood stabilizers and antipsychotic medications can be effective, response rates to these drugs are quite poor (Kowatch and Delbello, 2005; Pavuluri et al, 2009a). This study used functional connectivity methods to examine affective and cognitive neural circuits known to be abnormal in PBD to determine how pharmacological treatments influence these brain systems and whether changes in the distributed profile of brain function can predict treatment response

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.