Abstract

Brain injury is the most common cause of death postcardiac arrest. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is suggested to be useful in the prognostication in cases of postcardiac arrest brain injury. However, combined monitoring with aEEG and regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) for postcardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) patients to improve accuracy has not been reported. The purpose of this prospective observational study is to assess the usefulness of aEEG and rSO2 for PCAS patients with targeted temperature management (TTM) to predict neurological outcome and possibly identify the pathophysiology of postcardiac arrest brain injury. PCAS patients with TTM at 34°C were monitored by aEEG and rSO2 immediately after admission to the intensive care unit and evaluated at the start of monitoring, and 24 and 48 hours after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Patients were divided into two groups according to electroencephalography (EEG) pattern: a continuous EEG (C) pattern group and a noncontinuous EEG (NC) pattern group. Patients with C pattern had a significantly more favorable neurologic outcome compared with patients with an NC pattern at each point in time. No significant difference in rSO2 values was observed between the C pattern and the NC pattern at any time point. Variation coefficient at rSO2 in the NC group was significantly greater than that in the C group from the start of the monitoring to 24 hours. aEEG is useful in predicting outcome for PCAS patients whereas rSO2 is not.

Highlights

  • Despite recent medical advances, the outcome of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest is still very poor

  • 1266 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients were admitted to the hospital and 375 of these had return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)

  • One hundred and fifty patients received temperature management (TTM), and 49 patients were monitored by using Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) and rSO2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The outcome of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest is still very poor. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation defined causes of postcardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) into four types of pathophysiology: postcardiac arrest brain injury, postcardiac arrest myocardial dysfunction, systemic ischemia/reperfusion response, and persistent precipitating pathology (Nolan et al, 2008). PCAS patients are treated with targeted temperature management (TTM) in the intensive care unit (ICU) (Callaway et al, 2015) In this situation in the ICU, several kinds of neuromonitoring modalities, such as electrophysiology, intracranial pressure measurements, and brain oxygenation, are suggested to be useful in the prognostication and illustration of the pathophysiology in cases of postcardiac arrest brain injury (Reis et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call