Abstract

AbstractThe structure of the amorphous phase of GeTe‐based phase‐change materials is discussed. Comparison of the Ge(4):Te(2) and Ge(3):Te(3) configurations present in the amorphous phase suggests that the former is locally more stable while the latter can lower its energy due to ‘resonance’ interactions in structures within more extended order. We further demonstrate that polyvalency of the GeTe bonds can lead to the formation of negative‐U defects accounting for the high resistivity of the amorphous phase. Finally, polyamorphysm of the amorphous phase of Ge2Sb2Te5 is discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call