Abstract

BackgroundResearchers currently are not obligated to share individual research results (IRR) with participants. This non-disclosure policy has been challenged on the basis of participants’ rights to be aware and in control of their personal medical information. Here, we determined how patients view disclosure of research PET results of brain amyloid and why they believe it is advantageous or disadvantageous to disclose.MethodAs a part of a larger diagnostic trial, we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI). Participants had the option to receive their brain amyloid PET scan result (i.e., their IRR). Interviews were conducted before they received their IRR.ResultsA total of 38 aMCI patients (100% of study participants) wanted to know their IRR. The two most frequently mentioned reasons for choosing IRR disclosure were to better understand their brain health status and to be better able to make informed decisions about future personal arrangements (e.g., inheritance tax, moving into a smaller house, end-of-life decisions, etc.). Emotional risk was mentioned as the primary disadvantage of knowing one’s IRR. On the other hand, non-disclosure was considered to be emotionally difficult also, as patients would be uncertain about their future health condition.ConclusionsMany patients diagnosed clinically with aMCI want to know their brain amyloid test results, even though this knowledge may be disadvantageous to them. Knowing what is going on with their health and the ability to make informed decisions about their future were the two principal advantages mentioned for obtaining their amyloid PET results. Because of the overwhelming consensus of aMCI patients was to disclose their brain amyloid PET scan results, researchers should strongly consider releasing this information to research subjects.

Highlights

  • Researchers currently are not obligated to share individual research results (IRR) with participants

  • Knowing what is going on with their health and the ability to make informed decisions about their future were the two principal advantages mentioned for obtaining their amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) results

  • Because of the overwhelming consensus of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) patients was to disclose their brain amyloid PET scan results, researchers should strongly consider releasing this information to research subjects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Researchers currently are not obligated to share individual research results (IRR) with participants This non-disclosure policy has been challenged on the basis of participants’ rights to be aware and in control of their personal medical information. We determined how patients view disclosure of research PET results of brain amyloid and why they believe it is advantageous or disadvantageous to disclose. PET imaging of beta-amyloid plaques in the brain has been approved for diagnostic purposes in cognitively impaired patients who are being evaluated for AD [2, 3]. Reasons to support the non-disclosure policy mostly relate to differences between the research and clinical context, the limited efficacy of current treatments, the experimental nature of certain types of data, and the limitations of lay participants to objectively and reasonably interpret the results [5, 6]. Why would participants opt for the possibility to be informed about their IRR? What do participants perceive as possible advantages and disadvantages of knowing their IRR? Clear answers to these questions will help guide researchers and experimental subjects in deciding which option—IRR disclosure or non-disclosure—to choose

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call