Abstract

The application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer can promote rice yield, but is accompanied by considerable quantities of ammonia (NH3) volatilization and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The effect of N-fertilization to these gas emissions in saline-alkali paddy ecosystems is unclear. A 137-day mesocosm-scale experiment was carried out to clarify the effect of different N-fertilizer application strategies on NH3 volatilization and GHG emissions in saline-alkali paddy ecosystems and to determine the microbiological mechanisms. Five N-fertilizer treatments consisting of control without N-fertilizer (CK), urea (U), urea with urease-nitrification inhibitors (UI), organic–inorganic compound fertilizer (OCF) and carbon-based slow-release fertilizer (CSF) were established. During the entire rice-growing season, the cumulative NH3 emissions of UI, OCF and CSF treatments were 22.60–25.55 % significantly (p < 0.05) higher than U, respectively. The cumulative methane emissions in all N-fertilizer treatments were decreased by 9.23–28.24 % compared with CK. The cumulative carbon dioxide emissions were U > CSF > OCF > CK > UI, and the cumulative nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were U > CSF > UI > CK > OCF. The global warming potential of UI was 5.39–32.35 % lower than all the other treatments. Compared with the other N-fertilizer treatments, the relative abundance of N-related functional bacteria (e.g., Sphingomonas and Alphaproteobacteria) in OCF treatment was increased, and the (nirS + nirK)/nosZ ratio was reduced, thereby decreasing the N2O emission. Overall, U is a better choice for controlling NH3 volatilization in saline-alkali paddy ecosystems, whereas UI and OCF are more beneficial for reducing GHG emissions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call