Abstract

The effluent from a facultative pond loaded at 80 kg BOD ha(-1) day(-1) was treated in a subsurface horizontal-flow aerated rock filter (RF) and a subsurface horizontal-flow constructed wetland (CW) planted with Typha latifolia. Over a 12-month monitoring period BOD and TSS removals were higher, and effluent ammonia concentrations lower, in the RF than in the CW (> 75% vs. 25-75%, and 3.6 mg N L(-1) vs. 6 mg N L(-1), respectively). However, the ammonia concentration was lower in the CW effluent than in the aerated RF effluent during mid-July to mid-September (1.1 mg N L(-1) vs. 2.2 mg N L(-1)), but in winter it was higher than the influent concentration. Overall the performance of the aerated RF was better and more consistent than that of the CW.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call