Abstract

Background Treatment options for AML patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy are limited. Aims We aim to describe demographic and clinical characteristics, outcomes, and HCRU in this patient population. Methods This was a retrospective observational study of patients aged >60 years who received first-line (1L) treatment within 60 days of AML diagnosis between 1/1/2011–1/1/2018 and had >2 visits at US Oncology Network (USON) clinics. Patients were followed until 6/30/2018, last visit, or death, whichever came first. Data were sourced from structured fields of the USON database and chart reviews. Patient characteristics and HRU were assessed using descriptive statistics while overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and progression-free survival (PFS) from 1L treatment initiation were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results 378 patients were included with a median age of 79 years; 62.7% were male, 29.3% had an ECOG score > 2, and 38.4% had poor cytogenetic risk profile. Most patients received 1L hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy: azacitidine (AZA, 57.9%) or decitabine (DEC, 25.9%). Few patients received best supportive care only (7.1%) or other AML treatment (9.1%). Median (range) durations of 1L treatment among patients receiving AZA and DEC were 2.9 (0.0, 46.9) and 2.5 (0.1, 26.4) months, respectively. Median (95% CI) OS, TTF, and PFS in the AZA and DEC cohorts were 7.5 (5.7, 9.6) and 7.3 (4.8, 8.8) months, 3.4 (2.8, 4.4) and 3.7 (2.4, 5.2) months, and 6.7 (5.0, 8.0) and 5.7 (3.4, 7.4) months, respectively. Among patients receiving HMAs, 84.5% received at least one transfusion. Median number of red blood cell and platelet transfusions was 4.0. Hospitalization rates in the AZA and DEC cohorts were 79.9% and 83.7%; proportions with hospitalization >2 days duration were 64.4% and 66.3%, respectively, with median (range) durations of 6.5 (3.0, 34.0) and 7.0 (3.0, 26.0) days, respectively. Conclusions The low TTF and OS and high HRU in this real-world community oncology study indicates an unmet need to improve outcomes among AML patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. NCCN guidelines were updated since this study and future real-world studies are warranted to evaluate impact of novel therapies on treatment patterns and outcomes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.