Abstract

RhoGTPases are central switches in all eukaryotic cells. There are at least two known families of guanine nucleotide exchange factors that can activate RhoGTPases: the Dbl-like eukaryotic G nucleotide exchange factors and the SopE-like toxins of pathogenic bacteria, which are injected into host cells to manipulate signaling. Both families have strikingly different sequences, structures, and catalytic core elements. This suggests that they have emerged by convergent evolution. Nevertheless, both families of G nucleotide exchange factors also share some similarities: (a) both rearrange the G nucleotide binding site of RhoGTPases into virtually identical conformations, and (b) two SopE residues (Gln-109SopE and Asp-124SopE) engage Cdc42 in a similar way as equivalent residues of Dbl-like G nucleotide exchange factors (i.e. Asn-810Dbs and Glu-639Dbs). The functional importance of these observations has remained unclear. Here, we have analyzed the effect of amino acid substitutions at selected SopE residues implicated in catalysis (Asp-124SopE, Gln-109SopE, Asp-103SopE, Lys-198SopE, and Gly-168SopE) on in vitro catalysis of G nucleotide release from Cdc42 and on in vivo activity. Substitutions at Asp-124SopE, Gln-109SopE, and Gly-168SopE severely reduced the SopE activity. Slight defects were observed with Asp-103SopE variants, whereas Lys-198SopE was not found to be required in vitro or in vivo. Our results demonstrate that G nucleotide exchange by SopE involves both catalytic elements unique to the SopE family (i.e. 166GAGA169 loop, Asp-103SopE) and amino acid contacts resembling those of key residues of Dbl-like guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Therefore, besides all of the differences, the catalytic mechanisms of the SopE and the Dbl families share some key functional aspects.

Highlights

  • PGEX-2TK pGEX-2TK pBAD24-derivate pGEX-KG pACYC184 pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-KG pGEX-2TK pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184 pACYC184To test the stability of the preparations of SopEЈ and GST-SopEЈ and variants thereof, a 60 ␮M solution of the proteins in buffer S (40 mM HEPES/NaOH, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2) was incubated at 25 °C, and at several time points between 45 min and 48 h, precipitated material was removed by centrifugation, and 1-␮l aliquots of the soluble fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie Blue.Preparation of the Cdc42-mGDP Complex—Cdc42, Cdc42Ј, andCdc42D65A were loaded with O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)-GDP essentially as described for Rac1-mGDP [25]

  • The Cdc42 bound to GST-SopEЈ was eluted as a Cdc42-mGDP complex with 180 ␮M mGDP in buffer A and separated from free mGDP by gel filtration chromatography

  • Multiple Turnover Catalysis—The G nucleotide exchange activity of the SopEЈ variants was analyzed by fluorescence spectrometry using mGDP-loaded Cdc42 as a substrate [30]. mGDP is a GDP derivative that is frequently used in kinetic studies, because the fluorescence of the mant moiety can change dramatically upon binding to GTPases. mGDP bound to Cdc42 has a 4-fold higher fluorescence intensity than unbound mGDP [24, 32, 33]

Read more

Summary

Catalytically Important Residues of SopE

A The complexes were as follows: SopE-Cdc, Tiam1-Rac, Dbs-Cdc42 [1], Dbs-RhoA [2], and Intersectin-Cdc (the numbering is according to the SopE-Cdc complex). b If NH2 and O are switched in the intersectin Asn-1421. c For N . . . OE2. d For OG1 . . . OE1. Based on the mechanism of Dbl-like guanine nucleotide exchange [13] and the structure of the SopE-Cdc complex, we have proposed a mechanism for the GEF activity of SopE [26]. SopE and Dbl-like GEFs employ different amino acids to stabilize the rearranged switch I/II regions. The functional significance of these observations has remained unclear These proposed mechanistic similarities were based on the structure of the nucleotide-free Cdc42-SopE complex. The residues Asp-124SopE and Gln-109SopE have functional equivalents in Dbl-like GEFs, whereas the 166GAGA169 loop is a unique feature of SopE-like GEFs. despite all of the differences in structure, amino acid sequence, and catalytic core, both families of GEFs employ several equivalent amino acid interactions to stabilize the rearranged switch I and switch II region of RhoGTPases and accelerate G nucleotide release

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmids used in this study
Background
RESULTS
Preparation of Recombinant SopEЈ Variants
Kinetic Analysis of Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Activity of the SopE Variants
SopEЈ WTa
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call