Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging with a short acquisition time based on a self B0 correction using the turbo spin echo-Dixon method: A phantom study

Abstract

PurposeConventional amide proton transfer (APT)-weighted imaging requires a chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) sequence with multiple saturation frequency offsets and a B0 correction sequence, plus a long acquisition time that can be reduced by applying the conventional method using CEST images with seven radiation pulses (i.e., the seven-points method). For a further reduction of acquisition times, we propose fast two-dimensional (2D) APT-weighted imaging based on a self B0 correction using the turbo spin echo (TSE)-Dixon method. We conducted a phantom study to investigate the accuracy of TSE-Dixon APT-weighted imaging. MethodsWe prepared two types of phantoms with six samples for a concentrationdependent evaluation and a pH-dependent evaluation. APT-weighted images were acquired by the conventional, seven-points, and TSE-Dixon methods. Linear regression analyses assessed the dependence between each method's APT signal intensities (SIs) and the concentration or pH. We performed a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's honestly significant difference post hoc test to compare the APT SIs among the three methods. The agreement of the APT SIs between the conventional and seven-points or TSE-Dixon methods was assessed by a Bland- Altman plot analysis. ResultsThe APT SIs of all three acquisition methods showed positive concentration dependence and pH dependence. No significant differences were observed in the APT SIs between the conventional and TSE-Dixon methods at each concentration. The Bland-Altman plot analyses showed that the APT SIs measured with the seven-points method resulted in 0.42% bias and narrow 95% limits of agreement (LOA) (0.93%–0.09%) compared to the conventional method. The APT SIs measured using the TSE-Dixon method showed 0.14% bias and similar 95% LOA (−0.33% to 0.61%) compared with the seven-points method. The APT SIs of all three methods showed positive pH dependence. At each pH, no significant differences in the APT SIs were observed among the methods. Bland-Altman plot analyses showed that the APT SIs measured with the seven-points method resulted in low bias (0.03%) and narrow 95% LOA (−0.30% to 0.36%) compared to the conventional method. The APT SIs measured by the TSE-Dixon method showed slightly larger bias (0.29%) and similar 95% LOA (from −0.15% to 0.72%) compared to those measured by the seven-points method. ConclusionThese results demonstrated that our proposed method has the same concentration dependence and pH dependence as the conventional method and the seven-points method. We thus expect that APT-weighted imaging with less influence of motion can be obtained in clinical examinations.