Abstract
During the Cold War, observers of American politics noted that an imperial presidency developed in regards to the decision to use force abroad. Although the Constitution and the War Powers Act of 1973 grant significant war powers to the Congress, Congress largely deferred and abdicated these powers to the commander in chief, as the President asserted essential unlimited constitutional authority. This practice held true when the United States used force against terrorist actors, such as President Ronald Reagans strikes against Muammar Qaddafi. However, President Clintons strikes against Usama Bin Laden represent a different example of the war powers interplay. Domestic political considerations for Clinton and the nature of the United States target presented new incentives and an unprecedented case of much closer consultation with Congress prior to using force.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
