Abstract

Elevated levels of both ozone and UV‐B radiation are typical for high‐altitude sites. Few studies have investigated their possible interaction on plants. This study reports interactive effects of O3 and UV‐B radiation in four‐year‐old Norway spruce and Scots pine trees. The trees were cultivated in controlled environmental facilities under simulated climatic conditions recorded on Mt Wank, an Alpine mountain in Bavaria, and were exposed for one growing season to simulated ambient or twice‐ambient ozone regimes at either near ambient or near zero UV‐B radiation levels. Chlorotic mottling and yellowing of current year needles became obvious under twice‐ambient O3 in both species at the onset of a high ozone episode in July. Development of chlorotic mottling in relation to accumulated ozone concentrations over a threshold of 40 nL L–1 was more pronounced with near zero rather than ambient UV‐B radiation levels. In Norway spruce, photosynthetic parameters at ambient CO2 concentration, measured at the end of the experiment, were reduced in trees cultivated under twice‐ambient O3, irrespective of the UV‐B treatment. Effects on photosynthetic capacity and carboxylation efficiency were restricted to trees exposed to near zero levels of UV‐B radiation, and twice‐ambient O3. The data indicate that UV‐B radiation, applied together with O3, ameliorates the detrimental effects of O3. The data also demonstrate that foliar symptoms develop more rapidly in Scots pine than in Norway spruce at higher accumulated ozone concentrations. Symbols and abbreviations: LSD, least significant difference; PAS300, UV‐B irradiance weighted according to the plant action spectrum of Green et al. (1974) normalized at 300 (nm); AOT40, (AOT = accumulated over threshold) reflects the sum of hourly ozone concentrations above 40 nL L–1 during daylight hours (> 50 Wm–2) ( Kärenlampi & Skärby 1996); A350, net photosynthesis at ambient CO2; G350, stomatal conductance for water vapour at ambient CO2; A2500, net photosynthesis at saturating CO2 (maximal potential photosynthetic activity); CE, carboxylation efficiency; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RuBP, ribulose 1,5‐bisphosphate; Rubisco, ribulose 1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; GLM, general linear model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.