Abstract

BackgroundIn the development of a clinical program for ambulant adults with cerebral palsy (CP), we investigated the validity of joint angles measured from sagittal video recordings and explored if movements in the transversal plane identified with three-dimensional gait analysis (3DGA) affected the validity of sagittal video joint angle measurements. MethodsTen observers, and 10 persons with spastic CP (19–63 years), Gross Motor Function Classification System I–II, participated in the study. Concurrent criterion validity between video joint angle measurements and 3DGA was assessed by Bland–Altman plots with mean differences and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and scatter plots were used supplementary. Transversal kinematics ≥2 SD from our reference band were defined as increased movement in the transversal plane. ResultsThe overall mean differences in degrees between joint angles measured by 3DGA and video recordings (3°, 5° and −7° for the hip, knee and ankle respectively) and corresponding LoA (18°, 10° and 15° for the hip, knee and ankle, respectively) demonstrated substantial discrepancies between the two methods. The correlations ranged from low (r=0.39) to moderate (r=0.68). Discrepancy between the two measurements was seen both among persons with and without the presence of deviating transversal kinematics. ConclusionQuantifying lower limb joint angles from sagittal video recordings in ambulant adults with spastic CP demonstrated low validity, and should be conducted with caution. This gives implications for selecting evaluation method of gait.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.