Abstract

Many researchers report that American Customer Satisfaction Index relates significantly and positively to firm value. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether such relation holds in the emerging markets such as Korea. Our preliminary OLS analysis reports that Korean customer satisfaction is irrelevant to firm value. Quantile regressions, applied for further analysis, report that customer satisfaction can be detrimental to firm value if the firm is enjoying the higher kind of value. These results undermine efforts, on the theoretical level, to establish Customer Satisfaction Index as a consolidated firm-value indicator; furthermore, managerial efforts to boost up firm value by managing customer satisfaction lose ground in the emerging markets. This study also corroborates Reinartz and Kumar’s (2002) marketing insight that to satisfy customers, make them loyal, is trivial for profitability and firm value in Korea perspective. The practical implication of our finding is that the relation between customer satisfaction and firm value becomes more ambiguous, especially when it is considered in the emerging market contexts. It also provides management with a fresh new insight that they should take prudence when they increase expenses on customer satisfaction since it turned out to be not a “panacea”.

Highlights

  • The limitations of financial indicators in predicting and evaluating firm value and performance have been addressed by many branches of business research

  • Untabulated6, our normality test on Tobin’s Q reports that its Jacque-Bera statistic (= 130,819.00, p-value = 0.000) rejects the null hypothesis of Tobin’s Q normally distributed. This supports our use of quantile regressions (QR) modeling conditional quantiles rather than the mean

  • Unlike prior literature reporting American customer satisfaction’s (ACSI) substantial contribution to firm value in the US, this study only discovers that Korean customer satisfaction (NCSI) is irrelevant to

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The limitations of financial indicators in predicting and evaluating firm value and performance have been addressed by many branches of business research. Innovation is pinned down as a driver of firm value and performance (Cooper 1984; Pauwels et al 2004); sales promotion is counted as such a driver (Pauwels et al 2004); human capital (Huselid 1995; Vomberg et al 2015); customer satisfaction (Anderson et al 1994; Ittner, Larcker 1998; Anderson et al. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2017, 18(2): 258–272. Contrary to our common intuition, prior literature on the relation between customer satisfaction and firm value reports ambivalent results, especially when it is based on data from emerging markets such as Korea

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call