Abstract

New models of collective farming have been suggested as potentially useful approach for reducing inequality and transform peasant agriculture. In collectives, farmers pool land, labor, irrigation infrastructure, agricultural inputs and harvest to overcome resource constraints and to increase their bargaining power. Employing a feminist political ecology lens, we ask: to what extent can collective farming open up possibilities of empowerment for marginalized groups in smallholder agriculture? We examine the establishment of 18 farmer collectives by a research project in the Eastern Gangetic Plains, a region characterised by fragmented and small landholdings and a high rate of marginalised and landless farmers. We analyze ambivalances of collective farming practices with regard to (1) social relations across scales, (2) intersectionality and (3) emotional attachment. Our results in Saptari/ Eastern Terai in Nepal, Madhubani/Bihar, and Cooch Behar/West Bengal in India demonstrate how intra-household, group and community relations and emotional attachments to the family and neighbors mediate the redistribution of labor, land and capital. We find that gendered relations, intersected by class, age, ethnicity and caste, are reproduced in collective action and access to land and water, and argue that a critical feminist perspective can support a more reflective and relational understanding of collective farming processes. Our analysis demonstrates that feminist political ecology can compliment commons studies by providing meaningful insights on ambivalences around approaches such as collective farming.

Highlights

  • Critical theoretical approaches are increasingly used to understand the governance of the commons as political (Clement 2010; Bennett et al 2018; Brisbois et al 2018), affective and relational (Mosse 1997; Nightingale 2011a; Singh 2017)

  • While “free-riding” is a dominant theme in economics and commons literature and a phenomenon observed by external experts, we argue for triangulating this perspective with an analysis of structural incentives and power relations which strongly influence the motivation of the marginalised to invest labor for collective farming

  • This paper interrogated the ambivalences of collective farming as approach for enabling marginal and tenant farmers to engage in smallscale agriculture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Critical theoretical approaches are increasingly used to understand the governance of the commons as political (Clement 2010; Bennett et al 2018; Brisbois et al 2018), affective and relational (Mosse 1997; Nightingale 2011a; Singh 2017). Developed through a project collaboration of researchers, local NGOs and farmers in the Eastern Gangetic Plains, collective farming is a practical, locally specific approach to overcome land fragmentation and labor shortages in contexts of emigration, as well as unequal landlord-tenant and gender relations. This practice has some similarities to the tenets of food sovereignity, which is a rights-based approach to define own agriculture led by a transnational peasants’ movement, La Via Campesina (cf Patel 2009; Agarwal 2014). Collectives have been suggested to have the potential to empower women by reducing labor and ease inequality in peasant agriculture as tenant and marginal farmers can increase their collective bargaining power, e.g. with landlords, governments and markets (Sugden 2016b; Agarwal 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call