Ambivalence resolution in the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: An exploratory case study

Abstract

Patient ambivalence towards change is a central therapeutic target in the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP). However, we do not know if and how patients resolve ambivalence across the sessions and modules of the UP. Previous studies have identified two types of ambivalence resolution—dominance and negotiation—and different patterns of resolution for recovered and unchanged cases. Objectives: This exploratory single case study aimed to describe the frequency of observed ambivalence resolution strategies across UP sessions and evaluate the impact of distinct ambivalence resolution strategies on ambivalence. Method: Sixteen sessions of a recovered case were coded with observational measures of ambivalence and ambivalence resolution. Results: Observed ambivalence significantly decreased; dominance remained highly frequent across sessions, and negotiation increased from the beginning to the middle phase of treatment but not from the middle to the final phase. Negotiation was significantly associated with ambivalence reduction. Conclusion: The progression of ambivalence resolution strategies differed from previous studies with distinct therapeutic approaches; promoting negotiation between the different parts of the client’s inner conflict across the whole therapy may be valuable in dealing with patient ambivalence in UP treatment.