Abstract
The philosophy of communication in the United States grew out of a reaction to positivist approaches to communication research, which had managed to render processes of communication anonymous through the eradication of the epistemological subject. Although the pursuits varied among founding proponents of a “philosophy of communication” within the International Communication Association, the concepts nevertheless displayed partisanship for conceptualizations of communication that included communicating subjects. After the early responses to positivism, however, a “new positivism” emerged that challenged that vision. Linked to postmodernist developments in other fields, it joined the old positivist skepticism that subtracted epistemological subjects from knowledge by suggesting a path that would subtract “communicating subjects” and even “communication” from the work of the “philosophy of communication.” Most recently, the new positivism has produced ambivalence over the prospects for communication with communicating subjects. In this essay the author concludes that this ambivalence signals a reconsideration of postmodern influences on the philosophy of communication, as well as the return of communication with communicating subjects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Annals of the International Communication Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.