Abstract

In the spatial analysis of crime, the residential population has been a conventional measure of the population at risk. Recent studies suggest that the ambient population is a useful alternative measure of the population at risk that can better capture the activity patterns of a population. However, current studies are limited by the availability of high precision demographic characteristics, such as social activities and the origins of residents. In this research, we use spatially referenced mobile phone data to measure the size and activity patterns of various types of ambient population, and further investigate the link between urban larceny-theft and population with multiple demographic and activity characteristics. A series of crime attractors, generators, and detractors are also considered in the analysis to account for the spatial variation of crime opportunities. The major findings based on a negative binomial model are three-fold. (1) The size of the non-local population and people’s social regularity calculated from mobile phone big data significantly correlate with the spatial variation of larceny-theft. (2) Crime attractors, generators, and detractors, measured by five types of Points of Interest (POIs), significantly depict the criminality of places and impact opportunities for crime. (3) Higher levels of nighttime light are associated with increased levels of larceny-theft. The results have practical implications for linking the ambient population to crime, and the insights are informative for several theories of crime and crime prevention efforts.

Highlights

  • The residential population from census data is commonly used to measure the population at risk in the spatial analysis of crime, mostly due to the availability of data

  • This study investigated the effect of ambient population measures and crime opportunity indices on the spatial pattern of larceny-theft in Xi’an

  • Our findings provide insights regarding quantifying the ambient population’s social activities from mobile phone data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The residential population from census data is commonly used to measure the population at risk in the spatial analysis of crime, mostly due to the availability of data. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 342 including mobile phone data [4,6], bus and metro smart card data [14], the LandScan Global Population Database (LSGPD) [1], social media location data [7,15], and footfall data [16]. They provide rich possibilities to generate an ambient population, they are not without limitations. Li et al [17] suggest that most smart card data only record a user’s boarding location and time and lack a user’s alighting information, which could lead to biased estimates of population

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call