Alzheimer’s disease specific MRI brain regions are differentially associated with accelerated decline as defined using sigmoidal cognitive turning point methodology in amyloid‐positive AIBL participants

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundVariability in cognitive decline among adults with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is seen across studies. While such variability is often modelled using linear models, in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study, application of a sigmoidal methodology has shown excellent precision in modelling cognitive and biomarker changes. Here we expand these findings by examining associations of brain volumes in AD specific Regions of Interest (ROIs) with accelerated cognitive decline among amyloid‐beta positive (Ab+) AIBL participants.MethodLongitudinal cognitive scores for the AIBL PACC, Language, Visuospatial functioning and CDR‐SB were mapped to sigmoidal trajectories, with a threshold defining the inflection point of accelerated cognitive decline. Participants to the left of the threshold were classified as having non‐accelerated decline (non‐accelerators), and participants beyond the threshold were classed as accelerators (Figure 1B). Using these classifications, we investigated differences in 16 ICV corrected ROI (left and right hemispheres pooled) for reductions in brain volume via generalised linear models adjusted for age, gender, and APOE‐e4 status. Three participant subgroups were tested: 1) Ab+/Tau unknown, 2) Ab+/Tau‐ and 3) Ab+/Tau+. Significant t‐values for the summed ROI volumes were mapped on a standard brain mesh for visualisation.ResultOf regions tested, two stood out consistently amongst top markers in each of the participant subgroups and cognitive outcomes: 1) supramarginal volume and 2) middle temporal volume (Figure 1C). Largest volume differences between accelerators and non‐accelerators were seen in the Ab+/Tau+ group; whilst smallest p‐values were in the Ab+/Tau unknown group due to a larger sample size (Table 1). Brain mesh visualization showed most of the AD signature ROIs altered in accelerator groups as compared with non‐accelerator groups. Figure 1D shows the AD signature for each cognitive outcome amongst the Ab+/Tau participant group. Top ranked ROI for the left being middle temporal volume (T=7.10, PACC) and supramarginal volume (T=7.10, CDR‐SB).ConclusionSigmoid analyses of MRI using binary cognitive scores show decreased ROI volumes in AIBL Ab+ participants with accelerated cognitive decline. This effect was mediated by known information on Tauopathy. Whilst effect sizes were high, smaller sample sizes in some groups affected p‐values and should therefore be replicated in larger samples.