Abstract
How could a fervent skeptic (as Cioran was in his youth) engage with a religious philosopher with systematic tendencies like Nae Ionescu? A detractor of philosophy with a philosophy devotee? Such are the questions we have to begin with when considering the challenging connection between the two. The conclusion will be that, despite the friendship between the two thinkers, they had rather different philosophical views. However, even though they stand at opposite ends from the perspective of these questions, we can find a fundamental common element in the two great Romanian thinkers, and they can also be joined philosophically, not only through the friendship relationship between a teacher and one of his favorite students: this common element would be an interest in religion, but from fundamentally opposite positions, one being a believer, the other a non-believer.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.