Abstract
The specifcity of the criminal law of the Nordic states is reflected in the fact that, in the trend of expanding punitiveness in the world and intensifcation in penal policy, one of the key features is avoiding the application of the prison sentence wherever it is possible and turning to its alternatives. Namely, the Nordic countries have remained on the same course for decades as regards the sanctioning of perpetrators of criminal offenses, and their mild penal policy, especially in the eyes of the Anglo-Saxon countries and countries under their influence, is directly related to high social spending in these societies and the existence of real social egalitarianism among citizens. The aim of this paper is to present a system of criminal sanctions in the law of the Scandinavian countries, with a key review of alternatives to prison sentence and their practical application, as well as to point out the reasons for the existence of such a system of sanctioning and its advantages in relation to legal systems with highly repressive elements in criminal policy.
Highlights
U tom smislu17 U navedenim zemljama uslovna osuda sa zaštitnim nadzorom može biti opozvana ukoliko učinilac izvrši novo krivično delo ili ukoliko ne ispuni neku od postavljenih obaveza, s tim da u okviru zaštitnog nadzora je u svim nordijskim zemljama moguće učiniocu nametnuti i obavezu podvrgavanja tretmanu – lečenju od zavisnosti od droga ili alkohola (u Finskoj jedino za lica koja su u vreme izvršenja krivičnog dela imala od 15 do 21 godine)
The specificity of the criminal law of the Nordic states is reflected in the fact that, in the trend of expanding punitiveness in the world and intensification in penal policy, one of the key features is avoiding the application of the prison sentence wherever it is possible and turning to its alternatives
The Nordic countries have remained on the same course for decades as regards the sanctioning of perpetrators of criminal offenses, and their mild penal policy, especially in the eyes of the Anglo-Saxon countries and countries under their influence, is directly related to high social spending in these societies and the existence of real social egalitarianism among citizens
Summary
17 U navedenim zemljama uslovna osuda sa zaštitnim nadzorom može biti opozvana ukoliko učinilac izvrši novo krivično delo ili ukoliko ne ispuni neku od postavljenih obaveza, s tim da u okviru zaštitnog nadzora je u svim nordijskim zemljama moguće učiniocu nametnuti i obavezu podvrgavanja tretmanu – lečenju od zavisnosti od droga ili alkohola (u Finskoj jedino za lica koja su u vreme izvršenja krivičnog dela imala od 15 do 21 godine). Tako se u Danskoj u okviru uslovne osude određuje i zaštitni nadzor sa obavezom lečenja od zavisnosti od alkohola ukoliko je učinilac imao koncentraciju alkohola u krvi veću od 2 promila ili je ponovo učinio krivično delo vozeći u alkoholisanom stanju, dok se u Norveškoj vozačima pod uticajem alkohola, droga ili drugih medikamenata izriče uslovna osuda sa zaštitnim nadzorom koji uključuje učešće u tretmanu – lečenju, ali je za ovu sankciju neophodan pristanak učinioca.[25].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
