Abstract
This comment takes C. Hurl and B. Christensen’s recent article in Studies in Political Economy as an opportunity to ask how their retrospective construction of the New Canadian Political Economy reveals the way that the “ruling relations” shape intellectual histories. Too often, perspectives from white, straight, male “standpoints” are centralized, marginalizing the contributions of feminist, Indigenous, and queer scholars, among others. This comment explores how intellectual histories reproduce the social inequalities of the historical moment in which they are born.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.