Abstract

ABSTRACTThe shallow water equations (SWEs) are implemented in gravity current (GC) models because of the good balance between accuracy and computational effort. In this context appropriate treatment is required at the GC leading edge that is analogous to a moving boundary condition. To date, solution strategies used at the leading edge have not been systematically compared to determine the best alternatives. This work aims to analyse three strategies, comparing results with experiments and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (NS) models. Two of these alternatives are implemented using method of characteristics theory, while the third alternative, proposed by the authors, constitutes a newer conservative shock-tracking approach. Despite some of the differences in continuity error and computational effort, these solution strategies accurately predicted front trajectories albeit with much less computational effort when compared with NS models. As anticipated, GC shapes yielded by one-layer SWE models do not compare well particularly at earlier flow stages.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.