Abstract

Alternative splicing is commonly used by the Metazoa to generate more than one protein from a gene. However, such diversification of the proteome by alternative splicing is much rarer in fungi. We describe here an ancient fungal alternative splicing event in which these two proteins are generated from a single alternatively spliced ancestral SKI7/HBS1 gene retained in many species in both the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. While the ability to express two proteins from a single SKI7/HBS1 gene is conserved in many fungi, the exact mechanism by which they achieve this varies. The alternative splicing was lost in Saccharomyces cerevisiae following the whole-genome duplication event as these two genes subfunctionalized into the present functionally distinct HBS1 and SKI7 genes. When expressed in yeast, the single gene from Lachancea kluyveri generates two functionally distinct proteins. Expression of one of these proteins complements hbs1, but not ski7 mutations, while the other protein complements ski7, but not hbs1. This is the first known case of subfunctionalization by loss of alternative splicing in yeast. By coincidence, the ancestral alternatively spliced gene was also duplicated in Schizosaccharomyces pombe with subsequent subfunctionalization and loss of splicing. Similar subfunctionalization by loss of alternative splicing in fungi also explains the presence of two PTC7 genes in the budding yeast Tetrapisispora blattae, suggesting that this is a common mechanism to preserve duplicate alternatively spliced genes.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe fate of duplicated genes is incompletely understood, it is thought to fit one of three patterns: nonfunctionalization, neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization

  • Gene duplication is thought to be a major source of evolutionary innovation

  • Upon careful analysis of these sequences we noticed that the SKI7/HBS1 genes in five pre-whole genome duplication (WGD) Saccharomycetaceae each have a potential intron (Figure 1A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The fate of duplicated genes is incompletely understood, it is thought to fit one of three patterns: nonfunctionalization, neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization. Of these nonfunctionalization is thought to be the most common. If one duplicated copy mutates so that it loses one of the functions, and the other copy mutates so that it loses a separate function, selective pressure can subsequently maintain both copies by selecting for both functions [2,3] Multiple functions in this context can mean being expressed in multiple cell types, encoding proteins localized to different compartments, encoding proteins with distinct biochemical activities, etc

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.