Abstract
This paper presents an experimental study of two of alternative sorbents for mercury capture from the lignite combustion flue gas. The sorbents are based on calcium hydroxide and aluminosilicate, using different modifications. A commercially available activated carbon (AC) with bromine impregnation was selected as the reference sorbent. This sorbent is a state-of-the-art solution for mercury removal in industrial combustion facilities. However, its application is costly for power plants because of the market price of the AC and because the presence of carbon in the fly ash can complicate its further use, which gives a strong motivation for exploring new alternatives. Experimental investigation was carried out in a 500 kW pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed combustor using a lignite with naturally high mercury content. A injection system of our own design and construction was used to supply the sorbents to the flue gas downstream of the combustor at a flow rate in the range of 100–500 mg/m3N of the flue gas. Continuous measurement of mercury concentration was used upstream the sorbent injection and downstream the fabric filter, simultaneously. Different sorbent injection rates and flue gas temperatures at the sorbent injection point were examined.The mercury capture ratio was evaluated considering the Hg balance in the combustor. It was shown that the mercury self-capture by the fly ash in the fluidized bed combustion system varies approximately from 30 to 90 %, depending on the SO2 concentration. The Hg capture ratio for calcium hydroxide was in a range of approximately 15–25 %, while for aluminosilicate it was 25–45 %, determined by the actual conditions of the flue gas and the initial Hg concentration. This is in the range of the reference AC, which typically reaches from 25 – 95%. The increased injection rate of the sorbents was reflected in the Hg capture ratio, but its promotion was observed only in the case of the aluminosilicate sorbent. A correlation of the Hg capture ratio with the flue gas temperature at the injection point was also clearly identified only for the aluminosilicate sorbent, when an increase in the temperature led to increasing in the capture ratio.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.