Abstract

Strategic compensation theory argues that rewards should be used to encourage employee activities that support organizational goals, but reward strategies often have confounding effects on employee attitudes and behaviors. Five reward strategies that might be followed—Individual Output, Group Output, Human Capital, Position and Market—were identified, and 154 employees from 10 companies were asked to indicate which were followed in their organizations. When reward strategies were compared with employee attitudes, some striking differences in responses between blue-collar and white-collar workers were revealed. The article concludes that compensation programs need to take into account alternative employee reactions among different classes of employees.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.