Abstract
Independent news websites and press played a vital role in creating spaces of contention in the context of the Moroccan pro-democracy movement of 2011. This article looks at the role of this press in disseminating alternative narratives in the hybrid media and political environment that followed the pro-democracy movement. Based on extensive interviews with journalists, this article examines journalistsâ practices in countering hegemonic media and political discourse, to understand how they contribute toâor hinderâthe formation of counter publics under tough repression. The article uses the critical frameworks of dominant and counter-publics and Judith Butlerâs concept of silencing.
Highlights
The Moroccan media and political landscape witnessed sporadic phases of openness, largely controlled by the regime, which did not build a lasting legacy, nor did it survive traditional restrictions on media freedoms and the public sphere
While the experiences of this critical press are traditionally examined through a historical lens, with a focus on their interplay with the political and economic structures of repression, this article focuses on their practices as journalists, in an attempt to understand how they contribute toâor hinderâthe formation of counter publics under tough repression
The recent zero tolerance policy implemented by the regime in dealing with expressions of dissent, in old and new media alike, is challenging the image of a hybrid media and political system in the process of modernizing that the regime likes to promote
Summary
The Moroccan media and political landscape witnessed sporadic phases of openness, largely controlled by the regime, which did not build a lasting legacy, nor did it survive traditional restrictions on media freedoms and the public sphere. Through practical examples of coverage of sensitive topics/events, the article attempts to make sense of forms of collaboration these journalists develop with the power and the implications this has on the formation of sustained counter narratives able to challenge the dominant discourse. The dynamics of this alternative and marginal space are examined through the analytical framework of dominant and counter publics, as well as the notion of silencing as a subtle yet powerful tool of censorship. Instead of considering this press a victim of the regimeâs repression, this article investigates the pressâ influence as an active player inâpotentiallyâpropagating counter narratives, and how the silencing tactics used by the regime are contributing to limiting their emancipatory effect
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.