Abstract

This paper explores the factors that influence citizens' attitudes toward the alternative provision of health care services, leading them to be willing to make extra, informal payments within the public health care system. We question whether these attitudes depend primarily on inherent normative preferences, such as beliefs about the government's responsibility to its citizens, or on certain aspects of the reality that they experience, such as satisfaction with the quality and quantity of services as well as the fairness of public systems. Analyzing the findings from a national survey, the paper shows that practical considerations and real-world conditions strongly relate to attitudes more than normative perceptions do.

Highlights

  • On Page 2, line 43 the missing citation should have been (Cohen and Flic, 2017) and the full reference is: Cohen, Nissim & Filc, Dani (2017).

  • “An alternative way of understanding exit, voice and loyalty: the case of informal payments for health care in Israel” The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 32 (1): 72–90.

  • On Page 3, line 1 the missing citation should have been (Filc and Cohen, 2015) and the full reference is: Filc, Dani & Cohen, Nissim (2015) “Blurring the Boundaries between Public and Private Health Care Services as an Alternative Explanation for the Emergence Black Medicine: The Israeli Case” Health Economics, Policy & Law, 10 (3): 293–310.

Read more

Summary

Introduction

On Page 2, line 43 the missing citation should have been (Cohen and Flic, 2017) and the full reference is: Cohen, Nissim & Filc, Dani (2017).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call