Abstract
Monitoring of anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass by means of the activated coagulation time (ACT) has become questionable due to the prolongation in the clotting time of patients receiving aprotinin. Because the celite-based ACT only indicates intrinsic coagulation, and sufficient anticoagulation is needed to also prevent extrinsic coagulation, the ACT may not be reliable. Three different clotting times, the celite-based ACT, the kaolin-based activated coagulation time (AKT) and the high-dose thrombin time (HITT), were compared in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 20 patients who were to undergo cardiopulmonary bypass. As expected, neither the kaolin-based assay nor the high-dose thrombin time was influenced by aprotinin, whereas the celite-based ACT was significantly prolonged in aprotinin-treated patients as compared to control patients ( P < 0.05). This study confirms that both kaolin-based and thrombin-based tests provide a reliable means of determining the degree of heparinization in the presence of aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
