Abstract

A variety of different models are now available for the treatment of patients experiencing psychiatric emergencies. In some areas, there are regional psychiatric emergency facilities. In most areas, there are freestanding emergency departments (ED) and/or urgent care centers. Regional psychiatric facilities have features in common with other psychiatric emergency services that have been discussed. There is less evidence regarding the psychiatric patient in freestanding emergency departments and urgent care centers. Some unique benefits and challenges should be considered when utilizing these facilities. Freestanding EDs and urgent care centers can function in more remote locations than traditional EDs; therefore, they extend the reach and impact of the medical establishment to more secluded populations and provide more opportunities for treating individuals who would otherwise have limited access to treatment facilities. Regional psychiatric emergency facilities will have psychiatrists available; however, the presence of specialized psychiatric care is less likely in freestanding EDs and urgent care centers. The increased use of telemedicine has made specialty care available to remote locations and, when used, can bring the expertise of psychiatric specialists to EDs and urgent care centers not physically staffed by mental health providers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.