Alternative methods of interpreting measurements of resistance to the leafhopper Empoasca kraemeri Ross and Moore in the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Abstract

Appropriate definitions of, and methods of measuring, resistance are sought using Phaseolus vulgaris, a major source of protein in Latin America, and its most important pest, Empoasca kraemeri. The concepts of general vigour and narrow-sense resistance are defined: these two components make up broad-sense resistance. The validity of these definitions, which depend on the inclusion of tolerance as a resistance mechanism, is discussed. In order to distinguish the components, 38 genotypes of P. vulgaris were grown with and without insecticidal proctection, in three replications in a split-plot design, with three planting dates. Seed yield per plant, and a visual score of damage symptoms or vigour, were measured. Three methods of estimating narrow sense resistance are considered: 1) the genotype × insecticide interaction effect in a split-plots analysis, 2) the yield of each genotype unprotected (Yu) divided by its yield protected (Yp). and 3) the deviation of each genotype from a regression of Yu on Yp. The third method overcomes some objections to the first two, and can be applied to damage and vigour scores as well as to yields. The 38 genotypes differed in narrow-sense resistance according to all three methods, and it appears that in practice Methods 2 and 3 were both valid. They also differed in general vigour. Breeders working with many pests and crops have found that low damage and high yield in the presence of the pest are effective selection criteria. The work reported here supports this view.