Alternative Approaches to the Assessment of the Systemic Circulation and Left Ventricular Performance: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this article is to examine the systemic circulation and left ventricular (LV) performance by alternative, nonconventional approaches: systemic vascular conductance (GSV) and the head-capacity relation (ie, the relation between LV pressure and cardiac output), respectively; in so doing, we aspired to present a novel and improved interpretation of integrated cardiovascular function. MethodsIn 16 open-chest, anaesthetized pigs, we measured LV pressure (PLV), central aortic pressure (PAo), and central venous pressure (PCV) and aortic flow (QAo). We calculated heart rate (HR), stroke volume, cardiac index (CI = cardiac output/body weight), mean PLV (P¯LV), and the average arteriovenous pressure difference (ΔP=P¯Ao−P¯CV); GSV = CI/(P¯Ao−P¯CV). We studied the effects of changing loading conditions with the administration of phenylephrine (ΔP¯Ao ≥ +25 mm Hg), isoproterenol (ΔHR ∼+25%), sodium nitroprusside (ΔP¯Ao ≥ −25 mm Hg), and proximal aortic constriction (to maximize developed PLV and minimize QAo). ResultsSodium nitroprusside and isoproterenol increased GSV compared with phenylephrine and constriction. A maximum head-capacity curve was derived from pooled data using nonlinear regression on the maximum P¯LV values in QAo bins 12.5 mL/min/kg wide. The head-capacity relation and the plots of conductance were combined using CI as a common axis, which illustrated that CI is the output of the heart and the input of the circulation. ConclusionsThus, at a given CI, GSV determines the driving pressure and, thereby, PAo. We also demonstrated how decreases in GSV compensate for arterial hypotension by restoring the arteriovenous pressure difference and arterial pressure.