Alternative approaches to potential of mean force calculations: Free energy perturbation versus thermodynamic integration. Case study of some representative nonpolar interactions

Abstract

We investigated the convergence behavior of potential of mean force (PMF) calculations using free energy perturbation (FEP), thermodynamic integration (TI), and “slow growth” (SG) techniques. The critical comparison of these alternative approaches is illustrated by the study of three different systems: two tagged argon atoms in a periodic box of argon, two methane molecules, and two benzene molecules maintained in a “T-shaped” conformation, both dimers embedded in a periodic box of water. The complete PMF simulations were carried out considering several protocols, in which the number of intermediate “λ” states, together with the amount of sampling per individual state, were varied. In most cases, as much as 1 ns of molecular dynamics (MD) sampling was used to derive each free energy profile. For the different systems examined, we find that FEP and TI unquestionably constitute robust computational methods leading to results of comparable accuracy. We also show that proper convergence of the free energy calculations, and further quantitative interpretation of the PMFs, requires total simulation times much higher than has been hitherto estimated. In some circumstances, the free energy profiles derived from FEP calculations tend to be slightly poorer than those obtained with TI, as a probable consequence of the greater sensitivity of FEP to the window spacing δλ. In the context of TI, and to a lesser extent FEP, simulations, it appears preferable to employ a limited number of “λ” points of the integrand involving extensive sampling, rather than numerous points with fewer samplings. Finally, we note that, at least in the case of nonpolar interactions, PMFs of reasonable quality can be generated using SG, and at a substantially lower cost than with either FEP or TI. © 1996 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.