Abstract

There is increasing theoretical and empirical support for the brain combining multisensory information to determine the direction of gravity and hence uprightness. A fundamental part of the process is the spatial transformation of sensory signals between reference frames: eye-centred, head-centred, body-centred, etc. The question 'Am I the right way up?' posed by a patient with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) suggests disturbances in upright perception, subsequently investigated in PCA and typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD) based on what looks or feels upright. Participants repeatedly aligned to vertical a rod presented either visually (visual-vertical) or haptically (haptic-vertical). Visual-vertical involved orienting a projected rod presented without or with a visual orientation cue (circle, tilted square (±18°)). Haptic-vertical involved orientating a grasped rod with eyes closed using a combination of side (left, right) and hand (unimanual, bimanual) configurations. Intraindividual uncertainty and bias defined verticality perception. Uncertainty was consistently greater in both patient groups than in control groups, and greater in PCA than tAD. Bias in the frontal plane was strongly directionally affected by visual cue tilt (visual-vertical) and grip side (haptic-vertical). A model was developed that assumed verticality information from multiple sources is combined in a statistically optimal way to produce observed uncertainties and biases. Model results suggest the mechanism that spatially transforms graviceptive information between body parts is disturbed in both patient groups. Despite visual dysfunction being typically considered the primary feature of PCA, disturbances were greater in PCA than tAD particularly for haptic-vertical, and are considered in light of posterior parietal vulnerability. KEY POINTS: The perception of upright requires accurate and precise estimates of orientation based on multiple noisy sensory signals. The question 'Am I the right way up?' posed by a patient with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA; purported 'visual variant Alzheimer's') suggests disturbances in the perception of upright. What looks or feels upright in PCA and typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD) was investigated by asking participants to repeatedly align to vertical a rod presented visually (visual-vertical) or haptically (haptic-vertical). PCA and tAD groups exhibited not only greater perceptual uncertainty than controls, but also exaggerated bias induced by tilted visual orientation cues (visual-vertical) and grip side (haptic-vertical). When modelled, these abnormalities, which were particularly evident in PCA haptic-vertical performance, were compatible with disruption of a mechanism that spatially transforms verticality information between body parts. The findings suggest an important role of posterior parietal cortex in verticality perception, and have implications for understanding spatial disorientation in dementia.

Highlights

  • A good sense of verticality requires accurate and precise estimates of orientation relative to gravity predicated on multiple noisy sensory signals

  • In previous work (Dakin et al 2018) we had created a rod consisting of a yoked linear sequence of separate white dots, but in pilot studies we found that posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) participants sometimes experienced perceptual difficulties combining the yoked dots into a single object

  • Frame tilt had a greater effect on directional bias in either direction in PCA (P < 0.001) and typical Alzheimer’s disease (tAD) groups (P < 0.001; Fig. 3C and E), though there was no evidence that the effect of tilt differed between patient groups (P = 0.22)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A good sense of verticality requires accurate and precise estimates of orientation relative to gravity predicated on multiple noisy sensory signals. Parietal vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may contribute to the perceptual disturbances, disorders of gait, balance and posture, increased falls incidence, and spatial disorientation that have been reported (Allan et al 2009; Golden et al 2015; Coughlan et al 2018; Hardy et al 2020; Van Engelen et al 2020). To investigate this hypothesis, we have studied vertical-plane disorientation by measuring verticality perception in two groups of patients with neurodegenerative disease varying in clinical presentation. Short recognition memory test for words (joint auditory/visual presentation) Concrete synonyms test Naming (verbal description) Calculation (GDAb) Spelling (GDSTc set B, first 20 items) Gesture production test Digit span (forwards) Max forwards Digit span (backwards) Max backwards

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call