Abstract

After a cerebral stroke, a series of changes at the supraspinal and spinal nervous system can alter the control of muscle activation, leading to persistent motor impairment. However, the relative contribution of these different levels of the nervous system to impaired muscle activation is not well understood. The coherence of motor unit (MU) spike trains is considered to partly reflect activities of higher level control, with different frequency band representing different levels of control. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to quantify the different sources of contribution to altered muscle activation. We examined the coherence of MU spike trains decomposed from surface electromyogram (sEMG) of the first dorsal interosseous muscle on both paretic and contralateral sides of 14 hemispheric stroke survivors. sEMG was obtained over a range of force contraction levels at 40, 50, and 60% of maximum voluntary contraction. Our results showed that MU coherence increased significantly in delta (1–4 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz), and beta (15–30 Hz) bands on the affected side compared with the contralateral side, but was maintained at the same level in the gamma (30–60 Hz) band. In addition, no significant alteration was observed across medium–high force levels (40–60%). These results indicated that the common synaptic input to motor neurons increased on the paretic side, and the increased common input can originate from changes at multiple levels, including spinal and supraspinal levels following a stroke. All these changes can contribute to impaired activation of affected muscles in stroke survivors. Our findings also provide evidence regarding the different origins of impaired muscle activation poststroke.

Highlights

  • After a cerebral stroke, a series of changes at the spinal and supraspinal levels of the nervous system can influence the control of muscle activation, leading to different motor impairment

  • Our findings provide evidence that there are substantial changes in the common input, arising from the spinal and supraspinal circuitry, to the motor neuron pool innervating affected muscles, which can modify the control of muscle activation of stroke survivors

  • Low contraction levels that yielded a small number of motor unit (MU) caused two main issues: [1] the number of accepted MUs cannot satisfy the requirement of coherence calculation (≥8)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A series of changes at the spinal and supraspinal levels of the nervous system can influence the control of muscle activation, leading to different motor impairment. The cross-correlation analysis of MU spike trains in the time domain has been widely used to study the connectivity between the motor neuron pool and the spinal or cortical inputs [7,8,9,10,11]. The coherence analysis, which reflects the crosscorrelation of MU spike trains in the frequency domain, provides complementary and important information from another perspective that can reveal these activities of higher level control [12,13,14]. Previous studies have established the findings that the coherence of MU spike trains under 60 Hz is critically important and can be separated into four different frequency bands, including delta band (1–4 Hz), alpha band (8–12 Hz), beta band (15–30 Hz), and gamma band (30–60 Hz) [5, 15,16,17]. The delta band is thought to reflect the common modulation of firing rates [18, 19]; the alpha band highly depends on the feedback from muscle spindles and possibly results from rhythmical activities of the spinal reflex loop [20, 21]; the beta band may reflect cortical and subcortical activities [15, 19]; and the gamma band represents cortical activities [19]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.