Abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Dysfunction of the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 (encoded by SCN5A) is associated with arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, the mechanisms of which have been extensively studied in cardiomyocytes. However, patients carrying an SCN5A mutation often display clinical symptoms which are not readily explained solely by alterations in cardiomyocyte electrophysiology. For instance, carriers of the SCN5A-1795insD mutation, which is associated with features of Brugada syndrome and Long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), display severe bradycardia leading to excessive QT-prolongation and sudden death especially occurring at rest or during the night, suggesting autonomic triggers. Interestingly, SCN5A is not only present in cardiomyocytes, but also in intracardiac neurons (ICN). ICN modulate cardiac electrophysiological properties and their dysregulation may contribute to arrhythmogenesis. Purpose To explore whether ICN from mice carrying the Scn5a-1798insD mutation (the murine equivalent of SCN5A-1795insD) display electrophysiological alterations that may (in part) contribute to the arrhythmogenic phenotype. Methods and Results ICN were isolated by enzymatic dissociation from fat pads located in the pulmonary veins and sinoatrial node regions of the hearts of wild-type (WT) and Scn5a-1798insD mice. Immunodetection of the cholinergic marker ChAT confirmed the prominent cholinergic phenotype of ICN. In agreement with previous reports in other species, we also detected the presence of Nav1.5 in murine ICN. Nav1.5 expression was mainly observed in ChAT positive cells. To evoke repetitive action potential (AP) firing in single ICN, 500 ms-sustained depolarizing current pulses were applied of increasing amplitude (from 0 pA to 150 pA). Two types of neurons were identified on the basis of firing pattern characteristics: accommodating (neurons that discharged multiple APs decrementing in frequency during the pulse) and tonic (neurons that discharged multiple APs at a high frequency). APs firing frequency did not differ between WT and Scn5a-1798insD accommodating ICN, while it was significantly increased in Scn5a-1798insD tonic ICN as compared to WT (at 100 pA, AP count/500ms in WT CMs: 29.5±1.7, n=24; at 100 pA, AP count/500ms in Scn5a-1798insD: 36.2±2.0, n=18, p=0.02). Conclusions The impact of SCN5A mutations on ICN function are unexplored, but may play an essential role in arrhythmogenesis. The increased AP firing frequency observed in Scn5a-1798insD ICN may lead to increased release of neurotransmitters, such as acetylcholine, that in turn may contribute to the bradycardia observed in patients. Overall, further elucidation of the electrophysiological consequences of inherited Nav1.5 dysfunction in ICN might provide novel therapeutic targets to prevent lethal arrhythmias.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have