Abstract

Background Tenderness of masseters and temporalis can be considered a relevant tool for diagnosis of myo-type craniofacial pain disorders, but a limit of pain score systems is that they are based on subjective pain perception. Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a noninvasive and reliable tool for recording muscle activity. Therefore, we investigated whether a correlation exists between tenderness on masseters and temporalis, assessed by subjective pain scale, and muscles activity, evaluated by sEMG, in patients with painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and concurrent tension-type headache (TTH). Methods A cross-sectional study on fifty adult volunteer patients with TMD and TTH, who underwent tenderness protocol according to Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) guidelines, was conducted followed by sEMG recording of temporalis and masseters. Pearson's correlation was performed to investigate the correlation between muscular activity and subjective pain scores. Results An overall moderate correlation between muscle tenderness and sEMG values (y = 1 + 1.2 · x; r2 = 0.62; p < 0.0001), particularly in the temporalis, was observed. Segregation of data occurred according to tenderness and sEMG values. At the highest pain score, the mean sEMG absolute value was higher at the temporalis than the masseters. Conclusions Our study provides evidence that subjective pain perception can be objectively quantified at a magnitude proportional to pain severity. At greater tenderness scores, higher sEMG activity at the level of temporalis could help discriminate clinically prevalent TTH versus prevalent TMD. sEMG confirms to be an accurate tool to reliably objectify the subjective perception of pain. When combined with clinical evaluation and patients' symptoms, sEMG increases diagnostic sensitivity in the field of myo-type craniofacial pain disorders. This trial is registered with NCT02789085.

Highlights

  • Pain and muscle dysfunctions are considered keystone symptoms in a temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) [1] and are often classified as subtypes of a secondary headache disorder [2]

  • We investigated the correlation between tenderness on masseters and temporalis, assessed by subjective pain scale (NS) using validated criteria for temporomandibular disorder (TMD) (Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD: RDC/TMD; and Diagnostic Criteria for TMD: DC/TMD) and objectified muscle activity, evaluated by Surface electromyography (sEMG), in patients with diagnosis of TMD and concurrent tension-type headache (TTH)

  • When considering the sEMG findings as a whole (Figure 1(b)), segregation of data occurs according to tenderness and sEMG values, with lower pain scores (0-1) associated with lower sEMG values (2 mV) (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pain and muscle dysfunctions are considered keystone symptoms in a temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) [1] and are often classified as subtypes of a secondary headache disorder [2]. Palpation-induced pain of these muscles can be considered a relevant tool for differential diagnosis among painful TMD, primary headaches, and bruxism [9]. Tenderness of masseters and temporalis can be considered a relevant tool for diagnosis of myo-type craniofacial pain disorders, but a limit of pain score systems is that they are based on subjective pain perception. Erefore, we investigated whether a correlation exists between tenderness on masseters and temporalis, assessed by subjective pain scale, and muscles activity, evaluated by sEMG, in patients with painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and concurrent tension-type headache (TTH). Higher sEMG activity at the level of temporalis could help discriminate clinically prevalent TTH versus prevalent TMD. When combined with clinical evaluation and patients’ symptoms, sEMG increases diagnostic sensitivity in the field of myo-type craniofacial pain disorders. When combined with clinical evaluation and patients’ symptoms, sEMG increases diagnostic sensitivity in the field of myo-type craniofacial pain disorders. is trial is registered with NCT02789085

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call