Abstract

A foot drop stimulator (FDS) is a rehabilitation intervention that stimulates the common peroneal nerve to facilitate ankle dorsiflexion at the appropriate time during post-stroke hemiplegic gait. Time-frequency analysis (TFA) of non-stationary surface electromyograms (EMG) and spectral variables such as instantaneous mean frequency (IMNF) can provide valuable information on the long-term effects of FDS intervention in terms of changes in the motor unit (MU) recruitment during gait, secondary to improved dorsiflexion. The aim of this study was to apply a wavelet-based TFA approach to assess the changes in neuromuscular activation of the tibialis anterior (TA), soleus (SOL), and gastrocnemius (GA) muscles after utilization of an FDS during gait post-stroke. Surface EMG were collected bilaterally from the TA, SOL, and GA muscles from six participants (142.9 ± 103.3 months post-stroke) while walking without the FDS at baseline and 6 months post-FDS utilization. Continuous wavelet transform was performed to get the averaged time-frequency distribution of band pass filtered (20-300 Hz) EMGs during multiple walking trials. IMNFs were computed during normalized gait and were averaged during the stance and swing phases. Percent changes in the energies associated with each frequency band of 25 Hz between 25 and 300 Hz were computed and compared between visits. Averaged time-frequency representations of the affected TA, SOL, and GA EMG show altered spectral attributes post-FDS utilization during normalized gait. The mean IMNF values for the affected TA were significantly lower than the unaffected TA at baseline (p = 0.026) and follow-up (p = 0.038) during normalized stance. The mean IMNF values significantly increased (p = 0.017) for the affected GA at follow-up during normalized swing. The frequency band of 250-275 Hz significantly increased in the energies post-FDS utilization for all muscles. The application of wavelet-based TFA of EMG and outcome measures (IMNF, energy) extracted from the time-frequency distributions suggest alterations in MU recruitment strategies after the use of FDS in individuals with chronic stroke. This further establishes the efficacy of FDS as a rehabilitation intervention that may promote motor recovery in addition to treating the secondary complications of foot drop due to post-stroke hemiplegia.

Highlights

  • Stroke is one of the leading causes of serious and long-term disability, and foot drop is one of the most common disabling impairments resulting from hemiplegia due to stroke [1]

  • Functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the common peroneal nerve through a foot drop stimulator (FDS) provides a focused excitation to the peroneal nerve to promote active ankle dorsiflexion during initial double support at heel strike, at pre-swing lift-off and during the swing phase of gait to sufficiently clear the foot [10,11,12]

  • The tibialis anterior (TA) inhibitory period, which is usually apparent in healthy gait during 13–54% of gait cycles (GCs), seems to be indistinct at baseline for stroke participants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stroke is one of the leading causes of serious and long-term disability, and foot drop is one of the most common disabling impairments resulting from hemiplegia due to stroke [1]. Using FDS to drive muscle groups in specific activation patterns during walking has been shown to improve strength, walking speed, spatiotemporal parameters, and retrain ankle dorsiflexor muscle [tibialis anterior (TA)] activation timings [2, 9, 13,14,15,16]. These demonstrate the efficacy for FDS utilization in post-stroke rehabilitation, but they fail to precisely indicate how FDS technology can restore motor function [2, 12, 14, 16,17,18,19,20]. Time–frequency analysis (TFA) of non-stationary surface electromyograms (EMG) and spectral variables such as instantaneous mean frequency (IMNF) can provide valuable information on the long-term effects of FDS intervention in terms of changes in the motor unit (MU) recruitment during gait, secondary to improved dorsiflexion

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call