Abstract

The evolution of resistance to herbicides is a classic example of rapid contemporary adaptation in the face of a novel environmental stress. Evolutionary theory predicts that selection for resistance will be accompanied by fitness trade-offs in environments where the stress is absent. Alopecurus myosuroides, an autumn-germinating grass weed of cereal crops in North-West Europe, has evolved resistance to seven herbicide modes-of-action, making this an ideal species to examine the presence and magnitudes of such fitness costs. Here, we use two contrasting A. myosuroides phenotypes derived from a common genetic background, one with enhanced metabolism resistance to a commercial formulation of the sulfonylurea (ALS) actives mesosulfuron and iodosulfuron, and the other with susceptibility to these actives (S). Comparisons of plant establishment, growth, and reproductive potential were made under conditions of intraspecific competition, interspecific competition with wheat, and over a gradient of nitrogen deprivation. Herbicide dose response assays confirmed that the two lines had contrasting resistance phenotypes, with a 20-fold difference in resistance between them. Pleiotropic effects of resistance were observed during plant development, with R plants having a greater intraspecific competitive effect and longer tiller lengths than S plants during vegetative growth, but with S plants allocating proportionally more biomass to reproductive tissues during flowering. Direct evidence of a reproductive cost of resistance was evident in the nitrogen deprivation experiment with R plants producing 27% fewer seed heads per plant, and a corresponding 23% reduction in total seed head length. However, these direct effects of resistance on fecundity were not consistent across experiments. Our results demonstrate that a resistance phenotype based on enhanced herbicide metabolism has pleiotropic impacts on plant growth, development and resource partitioning but does not support the hypothesis that resistance is associated with a consistent reproductive fitness cost in this species. Given the continued difficulties associated with unequivocally detecting costs of herbicide resistance, we advocate future studies that adopt classical evolutionary quantitative genetics approaches to determine genetic correlations between resistance and fitness-related plant life history traits.

Highlights

  • Plant evolutionary theory predicts that adaptations conveying resistance to an environmental stress can result in an ecological fitness cost in the absence of the stress, relative to individuals without the adaptation (Coustau et al, 2000; Heil, 2002)

  • Whilst our results did not reveal a consistent reproductive fitness cost associated with NTSR conveyed by enhanced metabolism (EMR) in Alopecurus myosuroides, we did observe a significant reduction in seed production potential of the R phenotype in the nutrient deprivation study

  • Previous assessment of costs associated with NTSR to the acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) herbicides in A. myosuroides found no evidence of reduced fecundity (Keshtkar et al, 2017b), suggesting that a severe reproductive fitness cost associated with NTSR is not present in this species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plant evolutionary theory predicts that adaptations conveying resistance to an environmental stress can result in an ecological fitness cost in the absence of the stress, relative to individuals without the adaptation (Coustau et al, 2000; Heil, 2002). Such fitness costs can be allocation based, whereby limited plant resources are constitutively allocated to defense instead of to growth or reproduction (e.g., Herms and Mattson, 1992; Strauss et al, 2002). Within NTSR, enhanced metabolism of the herbicide molecule (EMR) is widely reported as an important resistance mechanism (Yuan et al, 2007; Délye, 2013; Yu and Powles, 2014; Scarabel et al, 2015), and the extent to which this mechanism affects plant fitness is being increasingly considered (Vila-Aiub et al, 2005a, 2009a; Keshtkar et al, 2017a,b)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.